Strict Scrutiny
Strict Scrutiny
Government
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
by Attorney RJ Dieken, Loki Esq Law, Montana
Today: #153 in Government on our combined chart.
Share this ranking
Claiming needs an RSS feed. Contact us.
Chart positions today
If you like Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS…, try…
Civics 101
NHPR
The DSR Network
The DSR Network
The Chris Plante Show
WMAL | Cumulus Podcast Network | Cumulus Media Washington
The Lawfare Podcast
The Lawfare Institute
America, Actually with Astead Herndon
Vox Media
Ranking history
History builds daily. We started tracking this show on the Government chart recently, so the trend line appears after a second day of data.
View as table
| Date | Apple Podcasts |
|---|---|
| Oct 3 | #153 |
About the show
Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it "information sourcing," and we hope that the podcast is a useful resource for members of the public who want to understand the legal issues of the day, prospective law students who want to get to know legal language and understand good legal writing, and attorneys who can use the podcast to be better advocates for their clients. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
Latest episodes
-
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY v. LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS (Removes injunction below)
September 29, 2026 · 15 minSend us Fan Mail The Court here removed the District Court's Stay. The Court held that the plaintiffs seeking a prohibition of the Governments use of the SAVE program to help states check voter rolls is overturned. The Court will decide in…
-
People Not Politicians v. Onder (Elections & the Purcell Principle)
September 26, 2026 · 8 minSend us Fan Mail In People Not Politicians v. Onder, the Supreme Court stayed federal-court orders that would have forced Missouri to use its 2025 congressional map instead of the 2022 map. Under state law, the 2025 map cannot take effect…
-
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL. v. SHERROD BROWN, ET AL. (Ripeness, Admin Law, Media Discounts for people running for public office).
September 5, 2026 · 9 minSend us Fan Mail The Court did not seem to think the 4th Circuit should have made a ruling on an appeal from the 4th Circuit, therefore they grant a stay of the 4th's Stay. Support the show
-
DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA, ET AL. (Federal Election rules and Article III Standing)
September 5, 2026 · 24 minSend us Fan Mail Support the show
-
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ET AL. v. NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES (WHITE HOUSE CONSTRUCTION, ARTICLE III STANDING)
September 1, 2026 · 17 minSend us Fan Mail The Supreme Court Thinks the National Trust for Historic Preservation in The United States Does not have Article III Standing. (Simplified) Construction on the White House East Wing can resume (Simplified) Support the show
-
WEST VIRGINIA v. B. P. J. (Transgender Athletes, Title IX)
July 1, 2026 · 14 minSend us Fan Mail 1. Title IX allows schools to provide separate women’s and men’s sports teams defined by biological sex, and West Virginia has permissibly maintained female sports for biological females consistent with Title IX. Support…
-
National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) (Campaign Finance/Election Law)
July 1, 2026 · 8 minSend us Fan Mail In NRSC v. FEC the Supreme Court granted Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to answer the question of whether the limits imposed by the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) on how much…
-
TRUMP v. BARBARA (BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP) RJD Recoding
July 1, 2026 · 16 minSend us Fan Mail Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship…