Inside HMCTS
Similar topics: lawyers and justice
Government
Proof Over Precedent
by Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School
Today: #119 in Government on our combined chart.
Share this ranking
Claiming needs an RSS feed. Contact us.
Chart positions today
If you like Proof Over Precedent, try…
Entitled
Similar topics: law and lawyers
Law Report
Similar topics: law and justice
Legal Aid NSW Criminal Law Division
Similar topics: law and lawyers
Washington Courts Report
Also in Government
Old Law, New Law - a podcast by the VLRC
Also in Government
Ranking history
History builds daily. We started tracking this show on the Government chart recently, so the trend line appears after a second day of data.
View as table
| Date | Combined Rank | Apple Podcasts |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 7 | #119 | #116 |
About the show
The Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School discusses the work of bringing credible evidence to lawyers, judges, and decision makers, to transform the U.S. justice system into an evidence-based field. We bring you weekly one-on-one interviews with experts in the area of access to justice -- researchers, lawyers, professors, law students, data analysts, research participants, and anyone who has an interesting role in this growing area.
Latest episodes
-
Episode 70: Exploring a Lawyer's Impact on Immigration Proceedings
October 6, 2026 · 37 minNo counsel, worse outcomes in immigration proceedings? This week on Proof Over Precedent, Access to Justice Lab Faculty Director and occasional podcast host Jim Greiner interviewed two Vera Institute of Justice researchers, Jacquelyn…
-
Episode 69: Study Interrupted—In-Person v. Remote Hearing Modalities
September 28, 2026 · 42 minWe like to use Proof Over Precedent as a platform to highlight our evidence-based findings, as well as others' studies, from randomized control trials in the field of law. This is not one of those times. In this week's episode, Professor…
-
Episode 68: Evaluating Procedural Fairness in Court and on Zoom
September 21, 2026 · 50 minSelf-represented litigants primarily measure procedural justice by whether they had a voice, were listened to, and were treated fairly in court. Do these basic marks of overall satisfaction differ between the mode in which the hearing took…
-
Are Death-Qualified Juries Qualified?
September 14, 2026 · 18 minJury selection should aim for a balanced and thoughtful panel; in capital cases, that balance is further underscored. This week's "Student Voices" post argues that "death-qualifying juries"--the practice of excluding jurors who oppose the…
-
Episode 67: Capital Jury Selection's Hidden Biases
September 14, 2026 · 18 minServing as a juror fulfills one's civic duty to ensure a system of checks and balances in the U.S. In capital cases, however, "death qualification" ensures that prospective jurors opposed to the death penalty will not have the opportunity…
-
Episode 66: Heirs' Property's Fragile Hold on Land Ownership and Justice
August 17, 2026 · 30 minJust because an individual may own property, does not guarantee that the person may keep that property—that’s the warning stemming from this week's podcast episode featuring an interview with Dr. Kara Woods, research analyst at Alcorn…
-
Episode 65: Access vs. Efficiency—Supreme Court Weighs Frivolous Filings
August 10, 2026 · 21 min"Martinizing", the controversial Supreme Court practice of denying court fee waivers for indigent litigants, is meant to reduce frivolous filings, but at what cost? This episode looks at the January 2026 Howell order in which Justice…
-
Episode 64: Can AI Resolve Brazil's Judicial Backlog?
August 6, 2026 · 22 minMore than 100 million pending cases await Brazil courts, so it may not be surprising that the country's Supreme Court Justice has a reportedly rosy view of AI in the court system, especially in time-sensitive civil and criminal matters…