United States
Australia
Brazil
Canada
Germany
India
Ireland
Japan
Mexico
New Zealand
Philippines
South Africa
Bound By Oath by IJ
From Institute for Justice
History
Law Office History
by Institute for Justice
Today: #128 in History on our combined chart.
Share this ranking
Claiming needs an RSS feed. Contact us.
Chart positions today · United Kingdom
Not on the United Kingdom charts we track today.
Not on the Canada charts we track today.
Not on the Australia charts we track today.
Not on the Germany charts we track today.
Not on the Brazil charts we track today.
Not on the Mexico charts we track today.
Not on the New Zealand charts we track today.
Not on the Ireland charts we track today.
Not on the India charts we track today.
Not on the Japan charts we track today.
Not on the Philippines charts we track today.
Not on the South Africa charts we track today.
If you like Law Office History, try…
AI Sidebar
Similar topics: law and legal
Everything AI & Law
Similar topics: law and legal
Checks & Balances
Similar topics: law and legal
4 Legal English
Similar topics: legal and law
Now We Defend
Similar topics: law and legal
Ranking history · United Kingdom
No ranking history for this show in United Kingdom over the last 7 days.
Latest episodes
-
Will Baude and the General Law
October 6, 2026 · 49 minFor our maiden voyage on “Law Office History” we welcome aboard Will Baude of the University of Chicago. After exploring his heady days as an Institute for Justice summer clerk we venture into the arguments he, Jud Campbell, and Steve…
About the show
Law Office History digs into the latest in legal history scholarship as it relates to the defense of the classical liberal legal order. Institute for Justice attorneys interview legal history scholars on their latest work exploring the law of the past and how it relates to our future. From the crafting of the Constitution to the mysteries of the common law to the convulsions of the twentieth century, Law Office History brings law and history together. Attempting to bridge divides in the legal history world, we support scholarship that avoids cherry picking sources while also understanding that the past belongs to all of us: lawyers, historians, law professors, judges, and the public.